| By
Arthur Maurice
NJBIA First Vice President
NJPRO Board of Trustees Member
Convening a
state constitutional convention to reduce property taxes is gaining
currency among political leaders anxious to show voters their commitment
to cut taxes.
I have a better idea
for lawmakers anxious to cut property taxes. "Just do it."
Reducing property taxes
should not require 12 months, $15 million of taxpayer money, 90
delegates, one statewide special election, and two statewide ballot
questions - all mandated under this convention proposal. Because
the convention is prohibited from even investigating whether government
spending is excessive and can be cut, it has little chance of accomplishing
its goals and thus would be a colossal waste of time and money.
Unfortunately in New
Jersey, plenty of tax money is already collected, including property,
income, sales and business taxes. One quick way to reduce property
taxes is to pay for school and other local costs, like police and
fire, with other existing taxes.
This approach is not
novel. New Jersey, like other states, already pays billions of dollars
to reduce property taxes. Clearly, though, New Jersey isn't doing
enough. The Garden State enjoys the dubious distinction of having
the highest property-tax burden in the nation. Measured on a per-capita
basis, for example, it came to $1,744 in 1998, more than twice the
national average.
A good place to find
the extra money needed to offset property taxes is the state budget.
In fiscal 2003 New Jersey state government will collect approximately
$23 billion from its taxpaying citizens and businesses. If you subtract
the money the state already spends to reduce property taxes (through
municipal and school aid), this still leaves state government with
another $12 billion. That $12 billion represents more than $1,400
for every man, woman and child in New Jersey.
The real question is
how would New Jersey taxpayers like their tax money to be used-to
finance a bloated state bureaucracy or to reduce their property
taxes? I have a suspicion that supporters of the constitutional
convention already know the answer to this question.
The number one priority
for New Jersey taxpayers, particularly businessmen and women who
do not benefit from homestead rebates and NJ Saver programs, is
lower property taxes. Rather than hold a costly, time-consuming
convention, our state's political leadership should define what
exactly state government should be doing with tax dollars, including
the ability to further reduce property taxes.
This means resetting
spending priorities, deciding what state government should and should
not be doing, and reallocating resources. It's not a new idea. President
Clinton gave the effort great prominence, putting Vice President
Al Gore in charge of his administration's "reinventing government"
campaign. Of course, in the business world such reorganizations
are de rigueur, occurring frequently to meet changing market conditions.
Unfortunately, government
unlike business is under no urgency to react to changing consumer
preferences and technologies.
In the more than 50
years since the constitutional establishment of our modern state
government, little has changed in its organization. Where there
were 13 state government departments in 1948, there are now 15.
Names have changed (the original Department of Defense is now the
Department of Military and Veterans Affairs) and some agencies have
vanished only to be revived (the Department of the Public Advocate
was abolished in 1994 and is slated for restoration in 2002). A
top to bottom review of government operations with an eye to efficiency
savings is long overdue.
Don't expect this property
tax convention to propose a cut in government spending to free up
more money for property-tax relief. As I mentioned before, the convention
is expressly prohibited from reviewing spending, either at the state
or local government level.
But our state
legislators can cut spending on their own, if they have the political
will. They should "just do it."
is First Vice President of the New Jersey Business & Industry
Association, an affiliate of the New Jersey Policy Research Organization
(NJPRO) Foundation and is also a member of the NJPRO Board of
Trustees.
|